Film Yes Men Fix the World, the Ethics of Demonstration and Bringing Issues to Light
1 . What ethical/moral/philosophical constructs are the active supporters and workers operating below with respect to all their tactics in protest?
The Yes Guys use Practical Ethics of Duty and Rule Consequentialism. With this kind of mindset, that they carry on laughs and hoaxes to reveal the lies of large corporations and government. Inside the theory of Duty-Based Values, people do the right issue because it is the proper thing to do. These types of large business giants bum but take the toll in others' wrong doings. An example of Duty-Ethics can be seen when Andy impersonates Jude Finisterra, a someone for Dow Chemicals, staying interviewed in BBC about the Bhopal Musical legacy catastrophe of Union Carbide and its lethal gas leakages in India. He is cited saying, " this is the new in history that a publicly held company, of anything near the size of Dow, has performed an action which is significantly against its important thing, simply because it's the right thing to do. вЂќ In theory of Rule Consequentialism, it states that an action is morally right even though it is essential by a great optimific sociable rule; relating back to Responsibility Ethics. While using motive under Rule Result, the Certainly Men planned to set a course of actions which might induce a reaction so that corporate leaders and govt may adapt to such a social regulation. As long as the end result is of a cheerful ending to get the public, Robert and Andy will have been successful to change and affect contemporary society in ways that money could hardly. To correct an action which causes harm to society more than benefits this, sometimes ridiculing and revealing the adverse aspects of it may be the only study course for corrective action.
2 . The actual tactics distract from the meaning or give power to the message? About what honest grounds? In theory, such jokes and hoaxes are supposed to generate change because of this from bad publicity. This derives via Kantian Values, which actually goes...